Blair’s last Scottish speech?
Big picture Labour politics arrived in Scotland today. Speaking to a crowded room of Labour activists at the Edinburgh Corn Exchange the man who lead Labour to three general election victories was about to deliver one of his last speeches north of the border. The theme: separation and the SNP. Separation for Scotland is personal for Blair. Just as countries are coming closer together, borders becoming more meaningless by each technological or political advance and people’s uniting when once they were apart, the SNP want to put in place old divisions and the politics of blame pitching Scotland against England, the PM warned.
There is little doubt that Blair is an incredible orator – a view shared on a cross-party basis - and I should declare an interest as a Labour member here in the interests of transparency. Having listened to many of his speeches in the past from barnstorming performances at the Commons despatch box to what many believe to be his finest speech at Manchester’s Labour Conference last year. I’m familiar with the nervous energy and excitement that fills the hall before he speaks. But today felt different. There was a palpable sense of tension and a heightened sense of anticipation for this was to be one of Tony’s last performances to the Scottish party faithful, and everyone in the room knew it.
The media angle on today’s speech centred, quite naturally, on his announcement that ‘in a few weeks I won’t be Prime Minister anymore’. Probably just as well, as the other defining moment for the media doubters in the room was when the ‘Building Britain’ Labour branding fell off the podium - a classic political out-take. The really powerful moment for me, though, was when the PM cut through the political noise surrounding separation and got right to the core of the debate in a heart-felt and direct question: were people of Scotland more concerned about separation than education, healthcare and the economy?
How is separation the biggest political issue in Scotland at these elections? Could this be because the old issues aren’t there anymore? On the tenth anniversary of Labour’s victory the big headline worries of the late nineties seem, literally, ten years ago. Scotland is no longer crippled by unemployment, investment in public services is up with new schools and new hospitals in every community and the cities look forward not back with new economic dynamism and social responsibility (although I should qualify these by saying I’m wearing electioneering Labour pink tinted spectacles at present). Perhaps it is because creeky old schools and waiting lists lasting years are no longer part of modern Scotland that what are for many peripheral issues like separation have been allowed to creep onto the agenda. Perhaps it is also because so fundamental is the union that we (and by we I mean Brits) have taken it for granted. Or is this the natural time for the countries of Britain to go their own separate ways?
The SNP argue it is because Labour has failed to use its two terms in office in Scotland and three in London to deliver real benefits to the people of Scotland and argue that (probably because of the economic changes of the last ten years) Scotland can stand on its own two feet. Certainly unpopular decisions from Westminster over Iraq have not helped, something Blair himself acknowledged this morning. Separation’s an interesting one as the LibDems and the Tories seem to share a common view with Labour, to a point, in favour of the Union. Scottish Tories say that the Lib-Lab Executive have not promoted the positive case for the union and that this has allowed the negative case of ‘give us back our oil’, for instance, to take over. The LibDems, firm unionists and keen to say such, have declared their support for the union and attacked calls for a referendum but privately some conceded this is part of the bargaining package for a possible SNP-LD coalition should Labour’s time at the top come to an end on Thursday.
The look and feel of the Scottish campaign is now very different from where it was a few days ago even. I’ve noticed a change in the way average punters on the doorstep are now talking about the elections and the alternative governments on offer on Thursday. Having dismissed an SNP victory as a vagary of polling, as most commentators did a few months ago, Scots are now realising that Alex Salmond could be the First Minister come Friday. Reality bites. Labour is hoping that Scotland is waking up to the SNP - but this doesn’t mean they’re going to vote against it though. Indeed, to many the Braveheart-esque rallying call for independence is just what they’ve been after for some time.
Party politics aside, there is a real sense of passion in this election, a sense of different offers and debate. But also a sense that things are coming to an end and something new is happening.
On my way out of the Corn Exchange as Tony left the building his usual sign off of ‘bye guys’ really hit home. In what could be only a few days he will resign as Leader of the Labour Party and the Blair era will suddenly come to an end. People today knew this. There were even people crying as the PM left. Not soft people, but big hard ex-miner types, grand men of industrial experience for whom the PM represented an escape from poverty and despair. “Why are we getting rid of him?” one of them said to a much bemused journalist from one of the TV news channels. “Dunno,” he replied. The people of Scotland get to decide whether they want rid of Blair’s party in Scotland on Thursday.
Cross-posted at Despatch Blog.